How to choose the best fitness tracker for you

You've decided you want to live a healthier life, and use the power of wearable technology to help go about it, but where do you start looking a fitness tracker? A host of different devices are available, each with their own specs and apps and specific features. We're here to help you make sense of the fitness tracker maze and find the right device for you.



It helps if you know a little bit about what you want before you start—like the specific activities that you're going to want to track—but if you'd rather see what devices are out there first, that's fine too.

All of the fitness trackers on the market, and indeed your existing smartphone, will be able to track your steps and calorie burn for you, but after that don't take anything for granted. You can find fitness trackers with a pile of differing features, all the way up to the smartwatches that are essentially mini computers on your wrist, which we'll mention last.

Fitness tracker basics
Almost all fitness trackers will slip around your wrist to measure your activities and give you feedback. One of the exceptions is the Misfit Shine 2 ($49.99), a circular disc you can put just about anywhere (including on your wrist if you really want). If you want to keep your arms free from dangling attachments, it's worth considering.

When you've decided where you want to wear your fitness tracker, think about the information you want it to show. The Fitbit Charge 2 ($148.95) displays you the time and some phone notifications, whereas the Misfit Ray ($49.99) just has a single LED light. The lack of information translates into lighter weight, which can be important for some athletes or aspiring athletes.

Read More at:
https://www.popsci.com/how-to-choose-best-fitness-tracker-for-you#page-2

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Has The Reintroduction Of Wolves Really Saved Yellowstone?

Image
APEX PREDATOR A gray wolf watches biologists in Yellowstone National Park, shortly after they fitted it with a tracking collar. The photo dates to 2003, 9 years after wolves were first re-introduced to the U.S. Northern Rockies. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service The story goes something like this: Once upon a time, we exterminated the wolves from the Rocky Mountain West, including the part that would become Yellowstone National Park. We thought this was a good idea because wolves frightened us, and also because they ate the domestic livestock we liked a lot more. But then interest in environmental conservation took hold. Scientists discovered that without wolves present in Yellowstone to hunt and kill prey, the elk population grew so large it ate up all the young willow trees until there were none. This affected the habitat of many other animals and plants in harmful ways and the ecosystem became unbalanced. Or, as science puts it, we caused a harmful “top-down trophic cascade...
Read more

Football helmets don’t prevent concussions. What can?

Image
On Sunday, countless Americans will hunker down in their living rooms to eat chips and really good dip, socialize with friends, and of course watch the Super Bowl—the cumulative game for a sport that’s been drawing heavy criticism as of late. Football is one of the most popular sports in America. But recently it's come under fire from coaches, parents, and medical professionals alike for the contact sports’ tendency to result in concussions—not just in professional football, but in college and youth leagues as well. There’s mounting evidence that repeated concussions can lead to a condition called chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). The degenerative disease can cause severe neurological problems including memory loss, confusion, aggression, and dementia. Of course, players aren't just slamming into each other skull-to-skull. They wear helmets, which one might reasonably assume cuts down on their concussion risk. Isn't that the point? Not exactly. And this isn’t ...
Read more